Zarazni rinotraheitis goveda - sudski slucaj

master's thesis

• Title (english): Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis – the court case
• Author: Igor Franjković
• Mentor: Petar Džaja (mentor)
• Mentor: Krešimir Severin (komentor)
• Committee member: Josip Kos
• Committee member: Krešimir Severin
• Committee member: Petar Džaja
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; (Department of Forensic and Judicial Veterinary Medicine); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2015, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE; Veterinary Medicine; Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety

Abstract

U sudskom spisu prikazan je slucaj posudbe bika, s jedne na drugu farmu, za
potrebe prirodnog pripusta krava. Navodi se kako su simptomi dišnih bolesti
zamijeceni vec prvi dan te smo utvrdili kako po pravilima struke nije dokazana,
odnosno potvrdena sumnja da je bik bio bolestan od zaraznog rinotraheitisa goveda.
Iako tužitelj primjecuje probleme na ostalim kravama vec nakon 10 dana, utvrdili smo
kako je zarazni rinotraheitis goveda službeno dokazan u akutnom obliku 17.7.2008.
kada su djelatnici HVI-a uzeli krv i nalaze uzrocnika.
Prema podacima Uprave za veterinarstvo, na tuženikovu gospodarstvu 2008.
nije bila službeno dokazana niti prijavljena navedena bolest.
Je li tuženi provodio zakonom propisane mjere na svojemu biku, ne možemo sa
sigurnošcu tvrditi jer nam dopis iz spomenute Uprave ne može poslužiti kao
vjerodostojan dokument zbog toga što, prema tome dopisu, informacija o prijavi
bolesti na gospodarstvu tuženika 2008. nije zabilježena. No, izdavanje spomenutih
Svjedodžbi o zdravstvenom stanju uvjet je, izmedu ostaloga, za provodenje
29
naredenih mjera i dobivanja negativnog rezultata. Kolege veterinari su s time
upoznati te pretpostavljam kako ne bi izdavali Svjedodžbu, a da navedeno nije
napravljeno jer bi se u suprotnom smatrali pociniteljima kaznenog prekršaja.
U cijelom slucaju dominira mišljenje kako veterinari prave propust time što kod
sumnje na zarazu ne dijagnosticiraju istu prema pravilima struke (uzimanje krvi i
slanje u HVI) te ne provode potrebne mjere kao što su izolacija, zabrana korištenja
bika za pripust i sl.
Nije sporno kako je bik zaklan i da ga je na klanje morala pratiti Svjedodžba o
zdravstvenom stanju. Ipak, navedena Svjedodžba ne postoji, a koja bi nam potvrdila
je li zaklana zdrava ili na bolest sumnjiva životinja.

Abstract (english)

The court record in case describes a borrowing of a bull from one farm to
another for the purpose of natural breeding of cows. It is stated that the symptoms of
a pulmonary disease were notice already the first day; it was determined that
according to the rules of the profession there was no proven nor confirmed suspicion
that the bull suffered from bovine rhinotracheitis. Although the plaintiff noticed a
problem with other cows after 10 days, we determined that the acute form of
infectious bovine rhinotracheitis was officially proven on 17th July 2008, when the
staff of Croatian Veterinary Institute took blood and pathogen samples.
According to the data of the Veterinary Directorate, the disease was neither
reported nor confirmed on the plaintiff's farm in 2008.
Whether the defendant implemented statutory measures on his bull cannot be
stated with certainty, because the mentioned data from the Directorate cannot serve
30
as a credible document because of the fact, that according to the data, there were no
records of the disease on the plaintiff's farm in 2008. However, one of the conditions
to issue the certificate of health is the implementation of statutory measures and a
confirmed negative result. Colleague veterinarians are aware of that fact and I am
certain they would not issue the certificate if the mentioned procedure was not
conducted, because otherwise they would be considered perpetrators in a criminal
offense.
In this case, the predominant opinion is that veterinarians make an oversight
because of the fact that when they suspect an infection they do not diagnose it
according to professional standards (i.e. take blood samples and send them to CVI)
and they do not implement the necessary measures such as imposing isolation,
preventing the bull from breeding and so forth.
There is no dispute that the bull was slaughtered and that it had to have a
health certificate when it was slaughtered. However, there was no such certificate
and it cannot be confirmed whether the animal was healthy or if there was suspicion
of disease.

• Keywords: sudski slucaj; zarazni rinotraheitis goveda
• Keywords (english): court case; infectious bovine rhinotracheitis
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:178:028426
• Study programme: Title: Veterinary Medicine; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: doktor/doktorica veterinarske medicine (doktor/doktorica veterinarske medicine)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
• Created on: 2016-01-18 14:13:23