Usmrćivanje psa vatrenim oružjem - sudski slučaj

master's thesis

• Title (english): Killing a Dog with a Use of Firearm - a Courtcase
• Author: Nikica Periša
• Mentor: Krešimir Severin (mentor)
• Mentor: Petar Džaja (mentor)
• Committee member: Dean Konjević (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Petar Džaja (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Krešimir Severin (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2021-03-26, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE; Veterinary Medicine; Veterinary Clinical Sciences

Abstract

U jednom kaznenom predmetu provedeno je veterinarsko vještačenje kojim se trebalo odrediti je li se pas pasmine pekinezer od zadobivenih ozljeda opisanih u činjeničnom dijelu optužnice uginuo na mjestu na kojem je pogođen ili se mogao kretati i do koje udaljenosti. Između ostalog je bilo potrebno očitovati se i o provedenom balističkom vještačenju i iznesenim tvrdnjama vještaka balističara koje se odnose na osobine psa i na sam način zadobivanja ozljeda. Preduvjet za obavljanje takve vrste vještačenja je kompletan očevid na mjestu događaja te mogući rezultati pretrage koje su naknadno proizašle iz njega. Iz nepoznatih razloga do provođenja kompletnog očevida nije došlo odnosno nije napravljena razudba niti rendgenološko snimanje lešine. Kako bi se ukazala važnost zacjelovitim istražnim radnjama pri sumnji na usmrćivanje vatrenim oružjemu ovom diplomskom radu obrađene su teme oružja i streljiva, vanjske, unutarnje i terminalne balistike, strijelnih rana, provođenja svih faza očevida tj. postupaka na mjestu događaja te sam čin razudbe kod sumnje na usmrćivanje vatrenim oružjem. Shodno rezultatima vještačenja, podataka i okolnosti zabilježenih u Nalazu iz spisa došlo se je do pretpostavke kako je predmetni pas uginuo na mjestu događaja na kojem zadobio ozljede, s koje udaljenosti je ispaljen hitac te je pretpostavljeno središte sačmenog snopa u odnosu na poziciju psa.

Abstract (english)

In one criminal case, veterinary expertise was conducted to determine whether the dog of the Pekinezer breed died from injuries described in the factual part of the indictment at the place where he was shot or could have moved and to what distance. Among other things, it was necessary to take a stand on the conducted ballistic expertise and the allegations made by ballistics experts concerning the characteristics of the dog and the way injuries were sustained. A prerequisite for carrying out this type of expertise is a complete inspection at the site of the event and possible results of the search resulting therefrom. For unknown reasons, there was no complete inspection or no understanding or X-ray of the carcass. In order to emphasize the importance for the complete investigation of the suspected killing of firearms in this graduate paper, the topics of weapons and ammunition, external, internal and terminal ballistics, gunshot wounds, conduct of all stages of the inspection, i.e. the procedures at the scene of the event, were dealt with and I am an act of understanding in the suspicion of the killing of firearms. Based on the results of expertise, data and circumstances recorded in the findings from the file, it was assumed that the dog in question died at the scene of the injuries, from which distance the shot was fired and the shotgun centre was positioned.

• Keywords: Vještačenje; ozljede; balistika; razudba; očevid; hitac; sačmeni snop
• Keywords (english): veterinary expertise; injuries; ballistics; necropsy; crime scene investigation; gunshot; bulletbeam
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:178:288602
• Study programme: Title: Veterinary Medicine; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: doktor/doktorica veterinarske medicine (doktor/doktorica veterinarske medicine)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2021-04-14 09:58:44